Beyond Violence: The Path Through Grief to Spiritual Evolution
The recent shooting at Annunciation School in Minneapolis continues to haunt our collective consciousness. While the news cycle moves forward—with yet more senseless acts of political violence—the Annunication tragedy leaves deep scars and pressing questions for our religious community: How does a young person educated in a Catholic school become capable of such violence?
There are no simple answers. Research consistently links exposure to media violence—including video games, television, movies, and music—with increased aggression in youth. Violent video games, in which killing is winning, is one of many influences on the behavior of youth today. While violent video games alone do not cause violence, when combined with depression, isolation, or family dysfunction, they can become catalysts for aggression. Some scholars suggest these games may serve as virtual rehearsals for actual violence, particularly when killing becomes synonymous with winning.
Violence is woven into the fabric of existence itself. Darwin described evolution as “red in tooth and claw”—a process that advances through struggle and death. Indeed, approximately 98% of all species have perished throughout evolutionary history. Yet paradoxically, death does not triumph. From destruction emerges new life, more robust and resilient than before. As Saint Paul wrote: “Death, where is your victory? Where is your sting?” (1 Cor 15:55).
Today’s unprecedented pace of evolutionary change leaves us struggling to adapt. Our relentless pursuit of perfection and accumulation paradoxically diminishes our humanity. We find ourselves increasingly anxious, depressed, and disconnected—quick to defend our positions, slow to connect with others. American culture still celebrates the “Marlboro man”—the lone individual who conquers opposition through force or cunning and rides off victorious. This ideal of rugged individualism is not merely unrealistic; it is fundamentally anti-human because it denies our relational nature.
Modern physics reveals what ancient wisdom long knew: we are intrinsically interconnected beings. As physicist David Bohm observed, beneath our apparent separateness, we share common cosmic roots and participate in the same cosmic process. This deep interconnection explains why violence anywhere wounds us everywhere. We feel its impact in our hearts and bones because we cannot escape our fundamental unity.
Feeling helpless against violence, however, we risk becoming violent ourselves—frustrated, angry, volatile. Thus, violence can breed violence in an escalating cycle. While spirituality offers an antidote to violence, we need an intermediate step: learning to grieve. We must weep for innocent lives lost, for possibilities destroyed, for the breakdown of community. Our culture mistakes grief for weakness, but this rejection of mourning leaves us spiritually impoverished.
Ancient cultures understood what we have forgotten: personal and collective mourning binds communities together in the midst of tragedy. Crying, wailing, dancing, drumming—these rituals express the deep pain of loss while affirming life’s preciousness. Grief awakens us to what matters most. It is a profound response to loss that deepens our capacity for life, love, and growth. Without grief, we can become mechanical, lifeless. If we cannot grieve, we cannot truly love. When we fully feel the pain of loss, our hearts become more tender, more open. Someone who has grieved deeply often becomes more compassionate toward others’ suffering. They develop what we might call “emotional muscle”—a greater ability to hold both joy and sorrow simultaneously. This is not about becoming hardened by suffering but rather becoming more fully human through it. Grieving for the loss of life humanizes us.
Even God grieves. The divine suffers within us the pain of loss—only a God who suffers can truly help us. God’s love is unconditionally present within us, infinite and ungraspable, making the impossible possible, to see life beyond death. God is ultimate mystery and to dwell with God is to dwell in mystery—a space not of easy answers but of transformative questions. In our violent age, the essential question becomes: How can we love more and better in the face of violence? Confronting violence with opposition—whether through actions, words, or protests—may provide temporary relief but such actions cannot achieve lasting transformation. Something deeper is needed.
The philosopher Henri Bergson recognized that while evolution carries us forward, conscious human effort is needed to transcend mere survival. Human spirituality, he argued, is essential to our evolutionary journey. What distinguishes humans is our capacity for spiritual transcendence: acquiring new minds and hearts that perceive new worlds. Jesus of Nazareth and Francis of Assisi, both living in violent times, taught that transcending violence requires an inner revolution. The fullness of life emerges from within, through practices of silence, fasting, prayer, and solitude. These disciplines connect the surface self with the deeper Self, where the divine is born.
Humans possess a capacity for mystical vision that distinguishes us from other animals. The mystic sees from a different center and loves from a deeper wellspring of love—a vision that seems incredible to the world at large. Jesus exemplified this mystical vision, perceiving possibilities invisible to those who could not see or who saw superficially.
Surprisingly, technology offers its own form of transcendence, imagining new planetary futures. Yet technology without spirituality can become dangerous, amplifying our destructive potential without developing our inner capacity for wisdom and compassion. If we seek to transcend ourselves with technology, the first question we must ask, toward what end and why?
Evolution has brought humanity to unprecedented levels of intelligence and self-consciousness. Our transcendent nature, however, demands spiritual development equal to our technological prowess. To awaken to this deeper nature is to grieve the losses in our midst while committing ourselves to a higher life—not beyond this world, but revealing the hidden potential of this world for greater life and love.
To live between loss and life is to grieve deeply—for young lives lost, for all lives lost, for communities shattered, for our collective failure to nurture the human spirit. Perhaps our modern culture cannot get beyond violence because we have not yet sufficiently grieved.
But grief is not the final word; it is a form of awakening to life on a deeper level. It must lead us inward, connecting us with the infinite love that draws us toward greater life. We cannot correct the tragedies of the past, but we can transform our lives toward a better future. The way forward is inward.
Our most urgent task today is helping younger generations discover their inner center—teaching them not just to succeed in the outer world, but to thrive in the inner landscape where true transformation begins. Only by embracing both grief and spiritual growth can we break the cycle of violence and fulfill our evolutionary potential.
The choice before us is clear: evolve spiritually or risk destroying what evolution has taken millennia to create. In choosing the path of inner development, we choose the power of love, the possibility of the impossible—a new world born from the heart of the divine mystery we call God.

32 Comments
Leave a Comment
Related Posts

Why Christianity Is Uncomfortable
In a recent conversation with a colleague, I was made aware that children born from 2023 onward will be AI children. They will never have known a world without being…
‘ to live between moss and life is to grieve deeply…’ your words resonate with what my heart feels as I watch the news daily and live life day by day. Thank you, Ilia.
Why did Gandhi lament how much he admired our Christ but so thoroughly disliked most of Christ’s followers? We seem to be very good at creating mean Christians and not very good at creating transformed ones who truly believe in loving one’s neighbor and serving the poor, the orphan and the alien.
Are we at a tipping point? Will we choose Love and control evolve, or choose not to live and devolve?
thank you for your wonderful teaching addressing how we stay in touch with God’s love while technology rapidly advances. Your guidance is a great blessing
Absolutely beautiful. But how do we begin, from a young age, to teach our children to spend time in meditative silence in order to grieve the losses caused by violence like school shootings and Ukraine, for example. What is the process to turn that from grief and despair, into compassion and joy? in fact, how do we do that individually, as adults?
Much of my problem with many religions (of all kinds — even ours) begins with the ways in which we anthropomorphize the concept of God. It’s done here when you say something like this: “Even God grieves. The divine suffers within us the pain of loss—only a God who suffers can truly help us.” All too often, then, we attribute very human emotions to this “God” of ours, even negative ones: anger, retribution, self-centeredness, dominance (and many other problematic emotions) that have led us to justify our positions at the expense of others — it perpetuates the “us vs. them” reactions that, all too often, have led us to war.
God is a far, far more Mysterious concept for me, One that infuses the very nature of all of Creation. That life-giving, life-sustaining, nurturing Holiness, is the God-concept we ought to be following. It’s why I’ve embraced the Hebrew word “shalom.” Yes, it means “peace,” but it also means “health,” “wholeness,” “well-being,” even (for me) the concept of “self-actualization” — of becoming all that every one of us were meant to be as a “child” of this mysterious Creator (cf. as this has been presented by Abraham Maslow in his “Hierarchy of Needs” ). Only then will we be able to be the best possible version of ourselves — all of us individually and as a cosmic community.
I like your remarks Doug and feel much the same way about our relationship with God, it’s not emotion but inner intuition that connects best. In 3 out of 4 Gospels Jesus points to a child as the icon for heavenly values, and children are born with their intuition fully intact. The problem happens as they grow and develop a rational mindset, then they forget to access their intuitive God given gifts. Teaching a child to meditate is the way to overcome this.
It’s a perfect setup formula. The kid grew up in a punitive justice (PJ) system. A system where PJ is the best answer for correction. Then he sees the hypocrisy of the conservative ideology and wants to talk about it. But talking about it with his parents, etc. is seen as heretical. It is not speakable. So he goes looking for someone, somewhere to talk about it. The most receptive and easy to find were radical liberals who are also PJ adherents. But since the kid gets a listening ear and acceptance he joins them. He feels at home because he’s in a “screw this”, PJ environment. He’s at home even though it is simply a different form of the same thing he grew up with. Conservative or Liberal, PJ is PJ and it is destructive and divisive. So he goes crazy and kills poor Charlie Kirk.
Why is crazy his most available option? Because PJ is still widely thought of as a good thing. Until PJ is seen as the divisive and destructive thing it is, we will continue to see this.
The devil is not the conservative or the liberal. The devil is the PJ. It is our common enemy
I’m worried that my first comment sounds like a sales plug for her book. I have met her, but I met her because her work aligned with work I’m doing on the connections between love and justice. My work has led me in some similar directions as her work. I’m also part of Pax Christi and her writing seems critical to me in better understanding the Peace of Christ. My encouragement to pay attention to what she’s saying is sincere. Also, I gave one piece of incorrect information in my first comment. The book is written by two people, Riane Eisler and Doublas Fry.
A week ago my wife and I made a visit to the Flight 93 National Memorial. As we walk through the displays and listened to presentations I found myself experiencing tears of grief as if this was something that just happened. I will forever remember this as a step in my spiritual growth.
I think it’s important to this discussion to take in Riane Eisler’s extensive exploration described in her book, “Nurturing Our Humanity- How Domination and Partnership Shape Our Brains, Lives, and Future.” In it she lays out a well researched and footnoted case for why partnership-based, love-based, actions are more influential on our evolution as a human species than violent ones. We are biologically evolved by and for caring for each other far more than we are evolved for hurting each other. In the book, Eisler makes these points about evolution in the early chapters and proceeds to talk about childhood experience of violence and how what is happening in early childhood, in families and schools, biologically shapes the developing brain as well as the understanding of dominance or domination systems as moral. And then furthermore she shares how this develops into support for authoritarian regimes, for terrorism, crime, war, some of our largest world problems of widespread violence, which begin within the family and how our children are nurtured. Please read this book, and look up her work online. There’s an upcoming conference on this too. I think it’s crucial understanding for peace in our world, as well as for examining what takes place in our Catholic schools and our church and families and how it might connect to incidents such as at Annunciation School.