“While panentheism is a helpful concept, the language of pantheism and panentheism is based on concepts of ‘being’ and ‘nature’ that can lead to misguided images of distinct beings in relation to one another. A more useful concept to describe the inextricable relationship of God and matter is ‘divine entanglement,’ because it points to a mutual, reciprocal, and interactive relationship. God and the world form a complementary whole.”
Ilia Delio, The Not-Yet-God, Carl Jung. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and the Relational Whole
“Aunque que el panenteísmo sea un concepto útil, al hablar de panteísmo y panenteísmo empleamos unos conceptos de ‘ser’ y ‘naturaleza’ que pueden conducir a imaginar erróneamente seres distintos en relación entre sí. Un concepto más útil para describir la relación inextricable de Dios y la materia sería ‘entrelazamiento divino’, porque apunta a una relación mutua, recíproca e interactiva, donde Dios y el mundo forman un todo complementario.”
Ilia Delio, The Not-Yet-God, Carl Jung. Pierre Teilhard de Chardin and the Relational Whole
What is being asked?
What is being moved?
View print-friendly version